Economic Reasoning in the Court of Justice of the EU: A Study on the Use of Economics in Competition Case-Law. The Principle of Proportionality in Viking and Laval: An Appropriate Standard of Judicial Review? European Labour Law Journal 1 (2): 236–253. Péter Cserne and Fabrizio Esposito, 101–117. Why US Judges Reject Economic Experts? In Economics in Legal Reasoning, ed. The Case for Simple Rules and Boring Courts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Įpstein, Richard Allen. The Economic Analysis of Judicial Behavior. ERA Forum 18 (1): 79–94.Įpstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. The Importance of Accounting for Passing-on When Calculating Damages That Result from Infringement of Competition Law. London: Palgrave Macmillan.ĭurand, Benoît, and Iestyn Williams. Péter Cserne and Fabrizio Esposito, 25–41. Economic Approaches to Legal Reasoning: An Overview. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Ĭoviello, Decio, Andrea Ichino, and Nicola Persico. Péter Cserne and Fabrizio Esposito, 9–24. What is Legal Reasoning About: A Jurisprudential Perspective. LSE “Europe in Question” Discussion Paper Series, No. Europe Against the Left? On Legal Limits to Progressive Politics. Péter Cserne and Fabrizio Esposito, 83–99. London: Palgrave Macmillan.īugaric, Bojan. What is Forensic Economics? In Economics in Legal Reasoning, ed. The Interface between Competition and the Internal Market: Market Separation under Article 102 TFEU. Routledge Frontiers of Political Economy. Alternative Approaches to Economic Theory: Complexity, Post Keynesian and Ecological Economics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.īeker, Víctor A., ed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |